当前位置: 首页 > 科研成果 > 正文

徐文鸣副教授

题目

期刊

文章

反思多层次资本市场的分层逻辑

《政法论坛》,2021年第4期

反思多层次资本市场的分层逻辑

证券民事诉讼制度实施效果的实证研究——以虚假陈述案件为例

《证券市场导报》,2017年第4期

证券民事诉讼制度实施效果的实证研究——以虚假陈述案件为例》,《证券市场导报

中美证券法公共执行机制比较研究——基于监管机构投入产出的实证分析

《财经法学》,2017年第3期

中美证券法公共执行机制比较研究——基于监管机构投入产出的实证分析

《证券民事诉讼与投资者赔偿——基于虚假陈述案件的实证分析》

《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,2017年第3期

《证券民事诉讼与投资者赔偿——基于虚假陈述案件的实证分析》

证券民事诉讼制度的实证研究

《中国政法大学学报》,2017年第2期

证券民事诉讼制度的实证研究

An Empirical Analysis of the Public Enforcement of Securities Law in China: Finding the Missing Piece to the Puzzle

European Business Organization Law Review18(2), forthcoming

An Empirical Analysis of the Public Enforcement of Securities Law in China: Finding the Missing Piece to the Puzzle

Truth and Robustness in Cross-Country Law and Finance Regressions: A Bayesian Analysis of Empirical “Law Matters”Thesis

Journal of Applied Finance & BankingVol 6(6).2016.

Truth and Robustness in Cross-Country Law and Finance Regressions: A Bayesian Analysis of Empirical “Law Matters” Thesis

Reforming Private Securities Litigation in China: The Stock Market Has Already Cast Its Vote

International Review of Law and Economics45: 23-32.

Reforming Private Securities Litigation in China: The Stock Market Has Already Cast Its Vote

Law Matters?: A Bayesian Analysis of the Cross-Country Relationship Between Anti-Self-Dealing Rules and Stock Market Outcomes

Applied Economics Letters21: 366-371.

Law Matters?: A Bayesian Analysis of the Cross-Country Relationship Between Anti-Self-Dealing Rules and Stock Market Outcomes

上一篇:徐光东教授

下一篇:李文静助理教授